Dear Mr. Leavitt
Re: this
Your definition of "fan" requires the kind of thoughtless devotion that leads toward bumber stickers like "America: Love It Or Leave It." And if one is willing to watch one's team play terribly -- as was the case for that basketball game -- it means that one can't call himself a basketball fan at all. It wasn't basketball, it was a bunch of guys wearing red and calling themselves Badgers that you were rooting for. That's not a fan, that's a jingoist.
There are good games, and there are bad games. That one was an eyesore.
Your definition of "fan" requires the kind of thoughtless devotion that leads toward bumber stickers like "America: Love It Or Leave It." And if one is willing to watch one's team play terribly -- as was the case for that basketball game -- it means that one can't call himself a basketball fan at all. It wasn't basketball, it was a bunch of guys wearing red and calling themselves Badgers that you were rooting for. That's not a fan, that's a jingoist.
There are good games, and there are bad games. That one was an eyesore.
5 Comments:
Ooooo--snap! The gloves are coming off! This debate is awesome. Although to be fair, when a teamdoes badly, don't know want to know why they did badly, and who did badly? Sometimes watching a horrible game can be useful. Like when the Red Sox lost the World Series in the '80's: wouldn't you rather know that it was some stupidass play that went between a guy's legs than say, zero hits? Then you know whom to blame!
By Anonymous, at 9:47 AM
Bill Buckner didn't lose the World Series by himself, Josh will tell you (I think).
It's a team game, and a better team would have won Game 7 the next day.
I enjoyed Josh's post, but to respond quickly:
Even when the Badgers suck, I still root for them. I don't enjoy watching them suck. But as Marnie points out, it is difficult to be knowledgable about how the team is playing unless I see them play.
By dl004d, at 10:12 AM
Game Six
METS 10TH: Backman made an out to left; Hernandez flied to center; Carter singled to left; MITCHELL BATTED FOR AGUILERA; Mitchell singled to center [Carter to second]; Knight singled to center [Carter scored, Mitchell to third]; STANLEY REPLACED SCHIRALDI (PITCHING); Stanley threw a wild pitch [Mitchell scored, Knight to second]; Wilson reached on an error by Buckner [Knight scored (unearned)]; 3 R, 3 H, 1 E, 1 LOB.
Red Sox 5, Mets 6.
Here's, in order, who is to blame for Game Six
1. Roger Clemens, for only going seven innings and generally pitching mediocre-ly in the World Series
2. John McNamara, for leaving Schiraldi in there too long
3a. Bob Stanley for the wild pitch
3b. Rich Gedman, who really might have been blamed for a passed ball just as easily.
4. Schiraldi, for pitching poorly
5. John McNamara again, for not making a defensive replacement for Buckner
6. Bill Buckner
By Josh, at 11:01 AM
Good explanation, Josh.
But as painful as it was for you to watch Game 6 at the time, you'd be a pretty useless Red Sox fan if you hadn't.
By dl004d, at 11:20 AM
Here's what I now believe: sports is entertainment. It's supposed to be fun. And I've been a foul-weather fan. It's make me foul-mooded. And since I'm allegedly watching these games to be entertained and to be happy, when those things don't happen, I'm likely to turn away.
I'm enough of an addict that I turn back (as I did last night when the Sox were down 7-2, and I turned off and on the game about 4 times). But, having been a fan -- fair or foul -- I can state unequivocally that fair weather is better. And I'm not going to spend my leisure time upping my blood pressure.
Roger Angell has written -- more poetically than I ever could -- that experience is the best tonic for the ups and downs of fandom. And I think that's where I've landed.
By Josh, at 11:47 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home